Diagnostic and therapeutic alkylenediamine compounds and process

ABSTRACT

Diamine compounds useful for treating neurodegenerated diseases characterized by the lack of dopamine neurons activity or for imaging the dopamine neurons are provided. The diamine compounds or serotonin are characterized by the formula: ##STR1## wherein: l, m and n can be the same or different and are an integer of 1 to 6; X, Y and Z can be the same or different and are hydrogen, halo, haloalkyl, (C 1  -C 6 ) alkyl, aryl, (C 1  -C 6 ) alkoxy, N-alkyl, (C 2  -C 6 ) acyloxy, N-alkylene, --SH, or --SR, wherein R is from the same group as R 1  and R 2  and can be the same or different than R 1  and R 2 , amino, nitro, cyano, hydroxy, --C(═O) OR 6 , --C(═O) NR 5  R 4 , NR 3  R 2 , or S(═O) k  R 1  wherein  k  is 1 or 2, and R 4  to R 6  are independently hydrogen or (C 1  -C 6 ) alkyl; 
     R 1 , and R 2  can be the same or different and are hydrogen, (C 1  -C 6 ) alkyl, hydroxyalkyl or mercaptoalkyl, --C(═O) OR 1 , cyano, (C 1  -C 6 ) alkenyl, (C 2  -C 6 ) alkynyl, or 1, 2, 4-oxadiazol-5-yl optionally substituted at he 3-position by W wherein any (C 1  -C 6 ) alky, (C 1  -C 6 ) alkanoly, (C 2  -C 6 ) alkenyl or (C 2  -C 6 ) alkynyl (C 1  -C 6 ) alkyl, hydroxy (C 1  -C 6 ) alkyl or mercapto (C 1  -C 6 ) alkyl and optionally can be substituted by 1, 2 or 3 Z; 
     W is (C 1  -C 6 ) alkyl or phenyl, optionally substituted by 1, 2 or 3 Z. 
     φ is phenyl, naphthyl, thienyl or pyridinyl.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates to a diagnostic and therapeutic1-[2-(diarylmethoxy) ethyl]-4-(3-aryalkyl) alpha, omegaalkylenediamines, their use as diagnostic or therapeutic agents and to aprocess for making the alkylenediamines.

2. Description of Prior Art

The dopaminergic (DA) neurotransmitter systems are intimately involvedwith a number of central nervous system (CNS) disorders including thoseinvolved with movement, e.g., Parkinson's Disease and reinforcingeffects, e.g., cocaine dependency. Interest in these two disorders inparticular has stimulated research efforts to develop specific agentsthat can be used either diagnostically, to evaluate the extent of thedisease, or therapeutically to antagonize the effect of cocaine. Cocainerecognition sites are localized on dopamine nerve terminals. Drugs thatbind, affect or block these sites therefore have potential uses whichinclude: (i) imaging probes for neurodegenerative disorders; and (ii)imaging probes for dopamine transporter/cocaine binding sites.Furthermore, in many instances these compounds or analogs become activeon other sites that affect the serotonergic system and, therefore, maybe used to treat disorders associated with serotonin (e.g., depression,PMS, weight, or aging).

Because of the unique anatomical location of the cocaine recognitionsites, a high affinity probe for imaging of these sites in vivo in thebrain can be carried out using positron emission tomography (PET) orsingle photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging. Such imagingis useful for diagnosing or monitoring the Parkinson's disease, otherneurological disorders characterized by the degeneration of dopaminenerve terminals or by aging. Preferably, the common target for compoundsthat would fulfill these objectives is the dopamine transporter (DAT), a12-transmembrane spanning presynaptic protein that removes the dopaminefrom the synaptic cleft following its release. The two classes ofcompetitive drugs that have been most extensively examined are thestable tropane analogs of cocaine characterized by WIN 35,428 (alsoknown as CFT) and the piperazine derivatives characterized by GBR-12935.Both exert their effect at nanomolar concentrations.

The cocaine analog, 2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-fluorophenyl) tropane (CFT)and other analogs have proven to be an effective probe for studyingdopamine-related diseases and cocaine binding sites in the striatum. Forexample, the progression of Parkinson's disease in primate models andsubjects can be monitored by administering radiolabeled analogs of CFTand imaging the distribution of radioactivity in the brain. PET has beenused to image ¹¹ C labeled analogs of CFT in primate models, Hantraye etal., Neuroreport 3.265 (1992), Farde et al., Synapse 16:93 (1994) whileSPECT has been used to image iodinated CFT analogs in both primatemodels and human subjects (Shaya et al., Synapse 10:169 (1992) andNeumeyer et al., J. Med. Chem. 34:3144 (1991, Elmaleh et al. J. Nucl.Med.

Various substances (particularly cocaine and cocaine congeners) arepotent inhibitors of dopainine transport in the striatum of the brainbecause they bind to the dopamine transporter. These substances havedifferent affinities or Ic₅₀ 's for inhibiting dopamine transport andfor blocking cocaine. The more strongly these substances block dopaminetransport, the more strongly they bind to sites on the dopaminetransporter which have been labeled by [³ H] cocaine or by [³ H] CFT,Madras et al., (1089) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 251:131-141; and Madraset al. (1989) Mol. Pharmacol. 36:518-524. The hope that these compoundsmight be Parkinson's markers is further supported by the parallelbetween loss of binding and loss of dopamine in the diseased brain(Madras et al. Catechol. Symp. 193, 1992).

Because of its widespread, low cost and simplicity, SPECT is preferredto PET for routine imaging directed towards diagnosis. Technetium-99m isthe tracer of choice for SPECT imaging because of its excellent physicalcharacteristics and widespread availability. Recently, technetium-99mCFT analogs were reported which appear to be extracted by the brain andconcentrate preferentially in its dopamine rich regions (Madras et al.,Synapse 22:239 (1996) and Meegalla et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117:11037(1995).

There is need for improved diagnostic agents and markers ofneurogenerative disorders which have improved specificity forconcentrating in dopamine rich regions in the brain. Such agents canprovide improved diagnosis for excluding at an early stage ofParkinson's disease as the cause of symptoms which may be usefulinformation in diagnosing other conditions. Moreover, early diagnosis ofParkinson's disease can facilitate the introduction of putativeprophylactic drug therapy (e.g., deprenyl) prior to the onset of moresevere symptoms, Kaufman and Madras (1991) Synapse 9:43-49. Detection ofnerve cell depletion in the presymptomatic phase in an animal model ofParkinson's disease would also be useful, e.g., when using the model toevaluate therapies for Parkinson's disease, Hantraye et al. (1992)Neurol. Reports 3:26-268; and Hahtraye et al. (1992) Soc. Neurosci.Abstra. 18:935.

There is a particular need for diagnostic agents and markers ofneurogenerative disorders that selectively target a domain transportingprotein (the dopamine transporter) in preference to another proteinknown as the serotonin transporter. In normal brain tissue, thedopamine: serotonin transporter density ratio is approximately 10:1.Diagnostic agents can be used to monitor the effects of Parkinson'sdisease therapy by determining the loss or reduction of loss ofdopamine. In certain neurodegenerative disorders, such as Parkinson'sdisease, nerve cells that produce dopamine (and on which the dopaminetransporter is located) undergo severe depletion while serotonintransporter ratio can fall to 50% in Parkinson's disease.

Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide improved diagnostic andtherapeutic compositions which have improved selectivity for beingconcentrated in doparnine regions of the brain as compared to presentlyavailable diagnostic and therapeutic compositions. Such improveddiagnostic and therapeutic compositions can provide a means for earlierdetecting an abnormal condition of the brain measurable by determiningthe state of the dopamine rich regions. In addition, such improvedtherapeutic composition can provide a basis for more effective treatmentof a patient such as a cocaine-dependent patient.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is based on the discovery thatN-[2-bis-[arylmethoxy)ethyl-N¹ -arylalkyl -α, ω)-alkanediamines havehigh affinity and high selectivity for dopamine transporters.

The compounds of this invention are represented by the Formula I andphysiologically acceptable salts thereof: ##STR2## wherein: l, m and ncan be the same or different and are an integer of 1 to 6; X Y and Z canbe the same or different and are hydrogen, halo, haloalkyl (C₁ -C₆)alkyl, aryl, (C₁ -C₆) alkoxy, N-alkyl, (C₂ -C₆) acyloxy, N-alkylene,--SH or --SR, wherein R is from the same group as R₁ and R₂ and can bethe same or different than R₁ and R₂, amino, nitro, cyano, hydroxy,--C(═O) OR₆, --C(═O) NR₅ R₄, --NR₃ R₂, or --S(═O)_(k) R₁ wherein _(k) is1 or 2, and R₃ to R₆ are independently hydrogen or (C₁ -C₆) alkyl;

R₁, and R₂ can be the same or different and are hydrogen, (C₁ -C₆)alkyl, hydroxyalkyl or mercaptoalkyl, --C(═O) OR₁, cyano, (C₁ -C₆)alkenyl, (C₂ -C₆) alkynyl, or 1, 2, 4-oxadiazol-5-yl optionallysubstituted at he 3-position by W wherein any (C₁ -C₆) alkyl, (C₁ -C₆)alkanoyl, (C₂ -C₆) alkenyl or (C₂ -C₆) alkynyl can optionally besubstituted by 1, 2 or 3 Z;

W is (C₁ -C₆) alkyl or phenyl, optionally substituted by 1, 2 or 3 Z.

φ is phenyl, naphthyl, thienyl or pyridinyl.

The compounds of this invention are useful as diagnostic agents in theirlabeled form with radionuclides such as ¹²³ I, ¹²⁵ I, ^(99m) Tc or thelike. In their labeled or unlabeled form, the compounds of thisinvention are useful as therapeutic agents including being agonists,partial agonists, antagonist or partial antagonist compounds against theeffects of cocaine.

The present invention also comprises a method for detecting parkinsonismin a human patient which comprises administering to a human patient adetectably labeled compound of this invention and detecting its bindingto CNS tissue such as by quantifying dopamine terminals with thecompound by utilizing PET or SPECT.

The present invention also provides a method for monitoring cocainebinding sites of the CNS such as by determining site occupancy bypotential cocaine therapeutics with the labeled compounds of thisinvention.

In another aspect of this invention, the compounds of this invention areutilized in a method for treating neurodegenerative disorders or cocaineabuse.

Therapeutic compositions according to the invention comprise a compoundas described above formulated in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.Such compositions can be used to selectively image cocaine bindingregions of the central nervous system of a human patient byadministering detectably labeled compound of this invention to thecentral nervous system and detecting the binding of that compound to CNStissue by (PET) or (SPECT). Such a compound also are useful in treatmentof neurodegenerative disorders characterized by dopamine deficits orcocaine abuse and to follow the effects of therapy for dopamine orcocaine abuse.

In one embodiment of this invention, intermediate compounds are providedwhich are precursors to the compounds represented by Formula I. Theseintermediate compounds are represented by Formula II: ##STR3## whereinX, Y, L, m, n, R₁, R₂ and W are defined above and R₃ is aryl, acetyl,allyl haloalkyl or alkenyl. The compounds represented by Formula II areuseful for producing the compounds of Formula I as represented by SchemeI.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

The FIGURE is a schematic diagram illustrating the process for producingthe compounds of this invention.

DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS

The diamine compounds of this invention are prepared for administrationto an animal in the form of a pharmaceutically acceptable free base or asalt such as tartrate, citrate, napthalene -1.5-disulfonate, fumarate,maleate, hydrochloride or hydrobromide salts.

The preferred compounds of this invention are characterized by theFormula III and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof ##STR4##wherein o, p and q can be the same or different and are 1 to 6;

X₁, Y₁ and Z₁ can be the same or different and are hydrogen, halogen,hydroxy, nitro, mercapto, mercaptoalkyl, (C₁ -C₆) alkyl or haloalkyl andR₁ and R₂ can be the same or different and are hydrogen, (C₁ -C₆) alkylhaloakyl, alkenyl or acyl.

The most preferred compounds of this invention are represented byFormula IV and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof ##STR5##wherein X₂, Y₂ and Z₂ can be the same or different and can be hydrogen,chloride, or fluoride, methyl or trifluoromethyl.

The compounds of this invention can be labeled with a radionuclide byany conventional process such as when ¹²³ I or ¹²⁵ I which are bound tothe compound at the X, Y or Z position or with ^(99m) Tc which is boundto the compound at the X, Y or Z position or with a derivitized nitrogensuch as in the positions of R₁ and R₂.

The diamine compounds of this invention are useful for imaging organscontaining doparnine receptors in an animal including humans. Thediamine compounds of this invention are particularly useful for imagingdopamine neurons in the brain, for example detecting the loss ofdopamine neurons in the brain. The diamine compounds of this inventionbind the dopamine transporter with higher affinity than currently useddopamine imaging agents. In addition, the diamine compounds areselective for the doparnine transporter and have good distribution toand penetration of the brain. Therefore, utilization of the diaminecompounds may enable earlier diagnosis of neurogenerative disorders thanis now possible as well as the monitoring of the effectiveness of thetreatment.

Imaging dopamine neurons in the brain with the compounds of thisinvention is used for monitoring the brain uptake of drugs such ascocaine or cocaine substitutes. The compounds of this invention mayblock cocaine binding but permit reuptake of dopamine. The cravingexperienced by individuals who abuse cocaine is a result of theoccupancy of the dopamine transporter by the drug. Cocaine abuse can betreated with drugs that occupy the sites associated with the dopaminetransporter in place of dopamine or cocaine. Imaging of the dopamineneurons in the brain with diamine compounds of the invention is used toidentify drugs which occupy the sites or other site of cocaine uptakeand therefore have potential to treat individuals who abuse cocaine. Inmany instances the analog may preferably occupy sites associated withseratonin.

The dopamine neurons in an individual can be imaged by administering animaging dose of one of the radiolabeled diamine compounds, for example,a diamine derivative represented by structural Formula (III) on FormulaIV. An "imaging dose" of a diamine compound is an amount whichconcentrates in an organ with dopamine neurons and which has sufficientradioactivity so that the distribution of dopamine neurons in the organcan be converted into an image by a technique such as PET or SPECT. An"imaging dose" of the diamine compound of the diamine compound of thisinvention typically ranges from about 0.5 mCi to about 50 mCi and with aspecific activity ranging from about 1 mCi/μM to about 100 mCi/μM,preferably from about 1 mCi to about 20 mCi and with a specific activityranging from about 10 Ci/μM to about 100 Ci/μM, but will vary accordingto factors such as the general health, age and sex of the individual andthe particular application.

In one aspect of this invention, a method of treating a subject isprovided in which a desirable therapeutic effect can be achieved byoccupying the dopamine transporter receptor with an agent or drug.Suitable subjects include individuals with Parkinson's disease, brainaging, Huntington's disease, tardive dyskinesiaa and schizophrenia. Themethod comprises administering to the subject a therapeuticallyeffective amount of this invention with a pharmaceutically acceptablecarrier. A "therapeutically effective amount" is the amount which bringsabout the amelioration of symptoms or slows the progression of one ofthe above-monitored conditions. Suitable dosages range from about 0.01mg/kg per day to about 100 mg/kg per day. In another aspect some ofthese compounds show selectivity to the sertonin transporter and/ormixed activity for both dopamine and serotonin and therefore, are usefulfor treating disorders associated with serotonin.

The diamine compounds are generally administered intravenously when usedfor imaging dopamine neurons. An appropriate composition comprising thecompound to be administered can be prepared in a physiologicallyacceptable vehicle or carrier. Suitable carriers include, for example, adermal patch, aqueous or alcoholic/aqueous solutions, saline andbuffered media. Intravenous vehicles can include various additives,preservatives, or fluid nutrients or electrolyte replenishers (See,generally, Remington's Pharmaceutical Science, 16^(th) Edition, Mack,Ed. (1990).

When used for treatment, the diamine compounds of this invention can beadministered by a variety of known methods, including orally or byparenteral routes (e.g., intramuscular, intravenous, transdermal,subcutaneous, nasal or topical). The form in which the compounds areadministered will be determined by the route of administration. Suchforms will include, but are not limited to capsular and tabletformulations (for oral administration), liquid formulations (for oral,intravenous, intramuscular or subcutaneous administration) and slowreleasing micro carriers (for intramuscular or intravenousadministration). The formulations can also contain a physiologicallyacceptable vehicle and optional adjuvants, flavorings, colorants andpreservatives. Suitable physiologically acceptable vehicles may includesaline, sterile water, Ringer's solution, and isotonic sodium chloridesolutions.

Autoradiographic distribution of the compounds are conducted accordingto in vitro techniques Kaufinan et al., Synapse 9:177 (1991) or ex vivotechniques (Kaufman and Madras, Synapse 12:99 (1992)).

SPECT or PET imaging may be carried out using any appropriate apparatus.Imaging is carried out on conscious subject using standard imaging (see,e.g., Medicine, Scientific American, Inc., ed. Rubenstein and Federman,1988; Jaszczak and Coleman, Invest. Radio. 20:897 (1985); and Coleman etal., Invest. Radiol. 21:1 (1986)).

The diamine compounds of this invention can be prepared as indicated inScheme 1. Modifications to these syntheses to prepare compounds otherthan those specifically depicted can be carried out by one or ordinaryskill in the art using no more than routine experimentation.

Example I

The synthetic scheme for the preparation of representativeN-[2-(bisarylmethoxy)ethyl-N'-aralkyl-α, ω-alkane diamines is depictedin Scheme 1. The requisite starting materials 3a,b (85%. 86%) and themono t-butyl, methyl ether (t-BOC) diamines were prepared according tothe procedures of Van der Zee et al, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 1980, Vol 15,page 363 and Krapcho et al, Sgn, Commun., 1990, Vol. 20, page 2559.Compound 3b was made by reacting 15 g of 2-bromomethanol with4,4'-difluorobenzhydrol in toluene, in the presence of concentratedsulfuric acid for 6 hours at reflux temperature. The reaction mixturewas cooled, washed with a saturated solution of NaHCO₃ and H₂ O. Theorganic layer was dried over magnesium sulfate, filtered and thevolatiles were evaporated. The resultant colorless oil was applied forcolumn separation on silica gel. Elution with 3% ethyl acetate/hexaneafforded 5.3 g of product as a colorless oil that gradually solidifiedon cooling. Compound 3a was prepard by the same method as compound 3bexcept benzhydrol was used in a starting material.

An important factor in the process depicted by Scheml is the formationof the N-[2-(bisarylmethoxy)ethyl-N-tBOC-polymethylendiamineintermediate. The production of this intermediate proceeds at good yield(78-83%). Compounds 4a, 4b and 4c were prepared from compounds 3a or 3butilizing either N-tert-butoxycarbonyl-1,2-ethanediamine orN-tert-butoxycarbonyl-1,3-propanediamine as a reagent dissolved in 40 mlof anhydrous DMF and stirred with 5.7 g (41.24 mM of potassium carbonatepowder for 1/2 hour. To this turbid solution,1-[Bis(4-fluorophenyl)methoxyl]-2-bromoethane, 4.50 g (13.75 mM) in 20ml of anhydrous DMF was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was stirredovernight at room temperature. About 60 ml of water was added slowly tothe reaction mixture which was then extracted with ether (70 ml×1),dried over magnesium sulfate and filtered. The crude oil obtained fromevaporation of ether was purified by chromatoagraphy on silica gel.Elution with solvent mixture (CHCl₃ :MeOH:Et₃ N/97:3:0.3) afforded 4.83g as slightly yellow oil. The intermediates 4a, 4b and 4c possesses verydifferent physiochemical properties. The intermediate having the mostuseful physiochemical properties is intermediate 4c. Intermediates 4aand 4b also were characterized by useful physiochemical properties. Theproduction of these polymethyleneamine intermediates, includingcompounds 4a, 4b and 4c, permits selectively functionilizing each aminomoiety to provide a useful number of exemplary diamine compounds of thisinvention.

Compound 5a was formed by dissolving 3.41 g of compound 4a in 30 ml ofanhydrous DMF and stirring with about 500 mg (20.8 mM) of sodium hydridepowder under N₂ atmosphere. After 1/2 hour, small bubbles were producedslowly, then 1.68 g (8.4, mM) of 1-bromo-3-phenylpropane was addeddropwise at room temperature. The reaction micture was allowed to stirfor 16 hours under N₂ gas inert atmosphere. The excess sodium hydridewas destroyed with methanol. About 40 ml of water were added slowly tothe reaction mixture then extracted with ether (60×3). The separatedether layer was dried over magnesium sulfate, filtered and evaporated toslightly yellow viscous oil. Column purification afforded 2.14 g ofproduct as viscous colorless oil.

Compound 5c was formed by reacting 3.41 g of compound 5a except compound4c was used in the reaction.

Compound 5b was formed in the same manner as compound 5a except thatcompound 4b was used in the reaction. The terminal tBOC group areremoved with acid (HCl-dioxane) to give the bis secondary amines 5a-c(32-37% yields). The N,N'-dimethyl product 6 was obtained bydeprotection of the intermediate followed by dialkylation with methyliodide in DMF using potassium carbonate as the base (yield˜25%).

Compound 6 was made by reacting compound 5c with 8 ml of 4.0 M HCl indioxane solution which was added slowly to 650 mg (1.24 mM). The de-tBOCprocess went on 24 hours. The resultant white solid was filtered andwashed with Et₂ O and Et₂ OAc. Washed white solid was dissolved in 10 mlof 4N NaOH solution and extracted with Et₂ O (30 ml×3). Ether extractswere dried over magnesium sulfate, filtered and evaporated to slightlyyellow oil that was applied for column separation on silica gel (CHCl₃:MeOH:ET₃ N/95:4:1). 170 mg of slightly yellow viscous oil was purified.

The products were characterized by IR, NMR and elemental analysis andwere consistent with the structures shown in Scheme I. The products wereconverted to salts, either oxalate or hydrochloride and evaluated fortheir ability to inhibit the neurotransmitter (dopamine-DA,norepinephrine-NE, and serotonin-5-HT) reuptake systems. The evaluationmethod used was as follows:

Drugs (10 mM stock solution) are dissolved in DMSO. The final DMSOconcentration in the assay is 0.01 percent. Pipetting is performed witha Biomek 2000 robotic work station.

[I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 Binding:

Preparation Cells are grown on 150 mm diameter tissue culture dishes.Medium is poured off the plate, the plate is washed with 10 ml ofphosphate buffered saline, and 10 ml of lysis buffer (2 mM HEPES, 1 mMEDTA) are added. After 10 min, cells are scraped from plates and pouredinto centrifuge tubes and centrifuged for 20 min at 30,000×g.Supernatant is removed, and the pellet is resuspended in 20-32 ml 0.32 Msucrose, depending on the density of binding sites in a given cell line(i.e., a resuspension volume which results in binding ≦10% of the totalradioactivity), with a Polytron at setting 7 for 10 sec.

Assay: Each assay contains 50 μl of [ISuprscpt 125] RTI-55 (40-80 pMfinal concentration) in a final volume of 250 μl. Krebs HEPES is usedfor all assays. Membranes are preincubated for 90 min. At roomtemperature in the dark and is terminated by filtration onto GF/Cfilters using a Tom-tech harvester. Scintillation fluid is added to eachsquare and radioactivity remaining on the filter is determined using aWallac μ-or β-plate reader. Competition experiments are conducted withduplicate determinations. Data is analyzed using GraphPAD Prism, withIC₅₀ values converted to K₁ values using the Cheng-Prusoff equation.

[³ H] Neurotransmitter Uptake for 11EK 293 cells expressing recombinantamine transporters:

Filtration assay

Preparation: Cells are plated on 150 mm dishes and grown untilconfluent. The medium is removed, and cells are washed twice with roomtemperature phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Following addition of PBS(3 ml), the plates are placed in a 25° C. water bath for 5 min. Thecells are gently scraped then triturated with a pipette. Cells frommultiple plates are combined. One plate provides enough cells for 48wells, which test two drug curves.

Assay: The assay is conducted in 96 1 ml vials and uses the TomtechHarvester and Betaplate reader. Krebs IIEPES (350 μl) are added to vialsand placed in a 25° C. water bath. Cells (50 μl) are added, preincubatedfor 10 min. and [³ H]DA, [³ H]5HT or [³ H]NE (50 μl, 20 nM finalconcentration) is added. Uptake is terminated after 10 min. Byfiltration on the Tomtech Harvester using filters presoaked in 0.05%polyethylenimine. Assays are conducted in triplicate iwth 6 drugconcentrations. Data is analyzed using GraphPAD Prism

The results obtained with the inhibition tests are shown in Table I. Theunits of measure for the values shown in Table I are in nM (nanomolar).

                  TABLE I                                                         ______________________________________                                        IC.sub.50 Values of test agents at biogenic amine transporters and their       selectivity for DA transporters                                                      IC.sub.50.sup.a                                                                             Selectivity                                                     Da.sup.b 5-HT.sup.c                                                                             NE.sup.d                                               .sup.3 H- .sup.3 H- .sup.3 H-Nore-                                           Compound Dopamine Serotonin pinehrine DA/5-HT DA/NE                         ______________________________________                                        5a      1230     >10,000  >10,000                                                                              >8     >8                                      5b 150 >10,000 >10,000 >65 >65                                                5c 49 500 >10,000 10 >200                                                     6 10 1,500 >10,000 150 >1,000                                                 2b 505 >10,000 >10,000 >20 >20                                                2c 780 >10,000 2,190 >13 >3                                                   GBR12909.sup.e 4.3 70 -- 16 --                                                GBR12935.sup.f 37 290  78 --                                                  Cocaine.sup.g 89 1,045 3,300 2                                              ______________________________________                                         .sup.a IC.sub.50 values represent the average of triplicate assays for N      2 runs                                                                        .sup.b Bupopion hydrochloride as standard competitive ligand, IC.sub.50 =     1230 nM                                                                       .sup.c Desipramine hydrochloride s standard competitive ligand, IC.sub.50     = 2.5 nM                                                                      .sup.d Imipramine hydrochloride as standard competitive ligand, IC.sub.50     - 2.6.nM                                                                      .sup.e Izenwasser et al, Eur. J Pharmacol, 1994, Vol. 263, page 277           .sup.f Rothman et al, Synaps 1993, Vol 15, page 34                            .sup.g Blough et al, J. Med. Chem., 1996, Vol 39, page 4007.             

The results in Table I show that most of the new compounds demonstratethe ability to inhibit dopamine uptake at concentrations comparable toor lower than that reported for cocaine. The IC₅₀ values approach thosecited for the potent inhibitors GBR12909 and GBR12935. The N, N₁-dimethyl derivative 6 which possessed the highest affinity, alsodemonstrated high selectivity for the dopamine transporter (10 nM) ascompared to norepinephrine (>10,000 nM) or serotonin (1500 nMtransporters.

The data of Table I show that the intact piperazine group present inGBR12909 and GBR12935 is not required for binding and can be replaced bya more conformationally flexible polymethylenediamine (n=1,2) moiety.Both ethylene and propylene spacers for the bis secondary aminespossessed submicromolar IC₅₀ values which approach that of thepiperazine GBR12935. Compound 6 and the N, N'-dimethyl analog of 5cdemonstrated greater affinity and selectively compared to the bissecondary amine. The presence of the 4,4'-difluro groups in thesederivatives also impart a significant enhancement of DAT binding asindicated by 5c vs 5a. A further comparison of the GBR products to theirE-and Z-iodoallyl analogs show that the presence of the terminalaromatic group plays a significant role in the transporter binding andit cannot be replaced by another group with a similar molecular weight,e.g., an iodo substituent, without a major decrease in affinity.

In summary, this series of analogs of the piperazine containing DATinhibitors, in which the piperazine group has been replaced with apolymethyenediamine moiety, demonstrates substantial affinity andselectivity for the dopamine transporter. The synthetic strategyprovides for the efficient synthesis of symmetrically asymmetricallysubstituted nitrogens within this linking moiety.

Example II

The following compounds were tested for cocaine affinity.

.N₁, N₂ Selective Acylated GBR analogs

    __________________________________________________________________________    Composition                                                                     Number Structure                                                            __________________________________________________________________________      31166                                                                                #STR6##                                                              31169                                                                          ##STR7 #                                                                        - 31171                                                                             #STR8##                                                                 - NOVA 18617                                                                        #STR9##                                                                 - Nova 18618                                                                        #STR10##                                                                -                                                                          Tail Amide ring-opened GBR analogs                                              31167                                                                                #STR11##                                                             31168                                                                          ##STR1 ##                                                                       - 31170                                                                             #STR13##                                                                - 31172                                                                             #STR14##                                                                - 31173                                                                             #STR15##                                                                - NOVA 18616                                                                        #STR16##                                                                -                                                                          Seco-GRB Series                                                                 31174                                                                                #STR17##                                                             31178                                                                          ##STR1 ##                                                                       - NOVA 18612                                                                        #STR19##                                                                - NOVA 18614                                                                        #STR20##                                                                - NOVA 18613                                                                        #STR21##                                                                -                                                                          N,N'-Dimethyl Seco-GBR Analogs                                                  31175                                                                                #STR22##                                                                - 31176                                                                             #STR23##                                                                - 31177                                                                             #STR24##                                                                - NOVA 18615                                                                        #STR25##                                                                -                                                                          3-Aminomethyl piperidine GBR analogs                                            31179                                                                                #STR26##                                                             31180                                                                          ##STR2 ##                                                                       - 31181                                                                             #STR28##                                                                - 31182                                                                             #STR29##                                                                - 31183                                                                             #STR30##                                                                -                                                                          4-Amino piperidime GBR analogs                                                  31184                                                                                #STR31##                                                              ##STR3 ##                                                                       -                                                                                   #STR33##                                                                -                                                                                   #STR34##                                                                -                                                                                  ##STR35##                                                             __________________________________________________________________________

Compound #31,166 was tested for its effects on radioligand [I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55) binding to and [³ H] doparnine uptake by HEK cells expressingcDNA for the human dopamine transporter (HEK-HDAT cells), its effect onradioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³ H] serotonin uptake by HEKcells expressing cDNA for the human serotonin transporter (HEK-hSERTcells), and its effects on radioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³H] norepinephrine uptake by HEK cells expressing cDNA for the humannorepinephrine transporter (HEK-hNET cells).

In HEK-HDAT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,166was 261 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 759 nM. In the uptake assays 31,166 had about the samepotency at blocking the uptake of [³ H] dopamnine, with an IC₅₀ value of181 nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =190 nM). A Hillcoefficient other than one suggests complex interactions with binding oruptake sites.

In HEK-hSERT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding sitewas lower than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for thesame site(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by31,166 was 126 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55 binding was 387 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,166 was less potentat blocking the uptake of [³ H] serotonin, with an IC₅₀ value of 2429nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =336 nM).

In HEK-hNET cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,166was 764 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 1766 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,166 was less potent atblocking the uptake of [³ H] norepinephrine, with an IC₅₀ value of 290nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =230 nM).

Effects of 31,166 on HEK-hDAT, HEK-hSERT and HEK-hNET cells

    ______________________________________                                                        31.166   Cocaine                                              ______________________________________                                        HEK-hDAT cells                                                                  [[I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 261 ± 59  759 ± 93                                        Hill coefficient -1.05 ± 0.16   -0.91                                     ± 0.20                                          [.sup.3 H] Dopamine Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 181 ± 13  190 ± 21                                        HEK-hSERT cells                                   [[I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 1926 ± 290  387 ± 88                                      Hill coefficient -0.81 ± 0.12   -1.02                                     ± 0.10                                          [.sup.3 H] Serotonin Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 2429 ± 1097 336 ± 78                                     HEK-hNET cells                                    [ISuprscpt 125] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 764 ± 346 1766 ± 369                                         (nM)                                              Hill coefficient -0.86 ± 0.15   -0.76 ± 0.09                            [.sup.3 H] NE Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 290 ± 119 230 ± 41                ______________________________________                                    

Numbers represent the means±SEM from at least three independentexperiments, each conducted with duplicate (for binding assays) ortriplicate (for uptake assays) determinations. When the K₁ or the IC₅₀for the test compound is greater than 10 μM, only two experimnents areconducted and no standard error is reported.

Compound #31,167 was tested for its effects on radioligand I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55) binding to and [³ H] dopamine uptake by HEK cells expressingcDNA for the human dopamine transporter (HEK-hDAT cells), its effect onradioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³ H] serotonin uptake by HEKcells expressing cDNA for the human serotonin transporter (HEK-hSERTcells), and its effects on radioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³H] norepinephrine uptake by HEK cells expressing cDNA for the humannorepinephrine transporter (HEK-hNET cells).

In HEK-hDAT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,167was 54 nm and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 759 nM. In the uptake assays 31,167 was more potent atblocking the uptake of [³ H] dopamine, with an IC₅₀ value of 47 nM, ascompared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =190 nM). A Hill coefficientother than one suggests complex interactions with binding or uptakesites.

In HEK-hSERT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding sitewas about the same as the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound,for the same site(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55 by 31,167 was 351 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacementof [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 binding was 344 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,167 wasless potent at blocking the uptake of [³ ] serotonin, with an IC₅₀ valueof 1987 nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =336 nM).

In HEK-hNET cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,167was 844 nM, and the K, value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 1766 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,167 had about the samepotency at blocking the uptake of [³ ] norepinephrine, with an IC₅₀value of 299 nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =229 nM).

Effects of 31,167 on HEK-hDAT, HEK-hSERT and HEK-hNET cells

    ______________________________________                                                        31,167   Cocaine                                              ______________________________________                                        HEK-hDAT cells                                                                  [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 54 ± 21 759 ± 93                                           Hill coefficient -0.74 ± 0.09   -0.91                                     ± 0.20                                          [.sup.3 H] Dopamine Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 47 ± 16 190 ± 21                                          HEK-hSERT cells                                   [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 351 ± 81  344 ± 39                                         Hill coefficient -0.98 ± 0.18   -1.11                                     ± 0.10                                          [.sup.3 H] Serotonin Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 1987 ± 317  336 ± 78                                     HEK-hNET cells                                    [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 844 ± 224 1766 ± 369                                       Hill coefficient -1.41 ± 0.05   -0.76                                     ± 0.09                                          [.sup.3 H] NE Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 299 ± 82 229 ± 35                 ______________________________________                                    

Numbers represent the means±SEM from at least three independentexperiments, each conducted with duplicate (for binding assays) ortriplicate (for uptake assays) determinations. When the K₁ or the IC₅₀for the test compound is greater than 10 μM, only two experiments areconducted and no standard error is reported.

Compound #31,168 was tested for its effects on radioligand [I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55) binding to and [³ H] dopamine uptake by HEK cells expressingcDNA for the human dopamine transporter (HEK-hDAT cells), its effect onradioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³ H] serotonin uptake by HEKcells expressing cDNA for the human serotonin transporter (HEK-hSERTcells), and its effects on radioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³H] norepinephrine uptake by HEK cells expressing cDNA for the humannorepinephrine transporter (HEK-hNET cells).

In HEK-hDAT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,168was 51 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 759 nM. In the uptake assays 31,166 had about the samepotency at blocking the uptake of [³ H] dopamine, with an IC₅₀ value of90 nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =190 nM). A Hillcoefficient other than one suggests complex interactions with binding oruptake sites.

In HEK-hSERT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding sitewas lower than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for thesame site(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by31,168 was 523 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55 binding was 387 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,168 was less potentat blocking the uptake of [³ H] serotonin, with an IC₅₀ value of 1145nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =336 nM).

In HEK-hNET cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,168was 545 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 1766 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,168 had the same potencyat blocking the uptake of [³ H] norepinephrine, with an IC₅₀ value of205 nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =230 nM).

    ______________________________________                                                        31,168   Cocaine                                              ______________________________________                                        HEK-hDAT cells                                                                  [I.sup.125] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 51 ± 6  759 ± 93                                            Hill coefficient -0.80 ± 0.02   -0.91                                     ± 0.20                                          [.sup.3 H] Dopamine Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 90 ± 24 190 ± 21                                          HEK-hSERT cells                                   [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 523 ± 28  387 ± 88                                         Hill coefficient -0.82 ± 0.14   -1.02                                     ± 0.10                                          [.sup.3 H] Serotonin Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 1145 ± 392  336 ± 78                                     HEK-hNET cells                                    [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 545 ± 176 1766 ± 369                                       Hill coefficient -1.38 ± 0.38   -0.76                                     ± 0.09                                          [.sup.3 H] NE Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 205 ± 44  230 ± 41                ______________________________________                                    

Numbers represent the means±SEM from at least three independentexperiments, each conducted with duplicate (for binding assays) ortriplicate (for uptake assays) determinations. When the K₁ or the IC₅₀for the test compound is greater than 10 μM, only two experiments areconducted and no standard error is reported.

Compound #31,169 was tested for its effects on radioligand I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55) binding to and [³ H] dopamine uptake by HEK cells expressingcDNA for the human dopamine transporter (HEK-hDAT cells), its effect onradioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³ H] serotonin uptake by HEKcells expressing cDNA for the human serotonin transporter (HEK-hSERTcells), and its effects on radioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³H] norepinephrine uptake by HEK cells expressing cDNA for the humannorepinephrine transporter (HEK-hNET cells).

In HEK-hDAT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,169was 224 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 759 nM. In the uptake assays 31,169 was less potent atblocking the uptake of [³ H] dopamine, with an IC₅₀ value of 415 nM, ascompared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =190 nM). A Hill coefficientother than one suggests complex interactions with binding or uptakesites.

In HEK-hSERT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding sitewas higher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for thesame site(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by31,169 was 213 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55 binding was 387 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,169 was less potentat blocking the uptake of [³ H] serotonin, with an IC₅₀ value of 1414nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =336 nM).

In HEK-hNET cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,169was 224 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55binding was 1766 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,169 was less potent atblocking the uptake of [³ H] norepinephrine, with an IC₅₀ value of 624nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =230 nM).

Effects of 31,169 on HEK-hDAT, HEK-hSERT and HEK-hNET cells

    ______________________________________                                                        31,169   Cocaine                                              ______________________________________                                        HEK-hDAT cells                                                                  [I.sup.125] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 224 ± 82  759 ± 93                                          Hill coefficient -0.91 ± 0.10   -0.91                                     ± 0.20                                          [.sup.3 H] Dopamine Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 415 ± 54  190 ± 21                                        HEK-hSERT cells                                   [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 213 ± 53  387 ± 88                                         Hill coefficient -0.98 ± 0.10   -1.02                                     ± 0.10                                          [.sup.3 H] Serotonin Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 1414 ± 591  336 ± 78                                     HEK-hNET cells                                    [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 224 ± 36  1766 ± 369                                       Hill coefficient -0.96 ± 0.11   -0.76                                     ± 0.09                                          [.sup.3 H] NE Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 624 ± 208 230 ± 41                ______________________________________                                    

Numbers represent the means±SEM from at least three independentexperiments, each conducted with duplicate (for binding assays) ortriplicate (for uptake assays) determinations. When the K₁ or the IC₅₀for the test compound is greater than 10 μM, only two experiments areconducted and no standard error is reported.

Compound #31,170 was tested for its effects on radioligand I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55) binding to and [³ H] dopamine uptake by HEK cells expressingcDNA for the human dopamine transporter (HEK-hDAT cells), its effect onradioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³ H] serotonin uptake by HEKcells expressing cDNA for the human serotonin transporter (HEK-hSERTcells), and its effects on radioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³H] norepinephrine uptake by HEK cells expressing cDNA for the humannorepinephrine transporter (HEK-hNET cells).

In HEK-hDAT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,170was 54 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 759 nM. In the uptake assays 31,170 was more potent atblocking the uptake of [³ H] dopamine, with an IC₅₀ value of 80 nM, ascompared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =190 nM). A Hill coefficientother than one suggests complex interactions with binding or uptakesites.

In HEK-hSERT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding sitewas lower than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for thesame site(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by31,170 was 556 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55 binding was 344 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,170 was less potentat blocking the uptake of [³ H] serotonin, with an IC₅₀ value of 1302nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =336 nM).

In HEK-hNET cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,170was 6044 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 1766 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,170 was less potent atblocking the uptake of [³ H] norepinephrine, with an IC₅₀ value of 399nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =230 nM).

    ______________________________________                                                        31,170   Cocaine                                              ______________________________________                                        HEK-hDAT cells                                                                  [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 54 ± 23 759 ± 93                                           Hill coefficient -0.75 ± 0.04   -0.91                                     ± 0.20                                          [.sup.3 H] Dopamine Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 80 ± 22 190 ± 21                                          HEK-hSERT cells                                   [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 556 ± 174 344 ± 39                                         Hill coefficient -0.90 ± 0.11   -1.11                                     ± 0.10                                          [.sup.3 H] Serotonin Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 1302 ± 66  336 ± 78                                      HEK-hNET cells                                    [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 704 ± 234 1766 ± 369                                       Hill coefficient -0.87 ± 0.16   -0.76                                     ± 0.09                                          [.sup.3 H] NE Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 399 ± 117 230 ± 41                ______________________________________                                    

Numbers represent the means±SEM from at least three independentexperiments, each conducted with duplicate (for binding assays) ortriplicate (for uptake assays) determinations. When the K₁ or the IC₅₀for the test compound is greater than 10 μM, only two experiments areconducted and no standard error is reported.

Compound #31,171 was tested for its effects on radioligand I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55) binding to and [³ H] dopamine uptake by HEK cells expressingcDNA for the human dopamine transporter (HEK-hDAT cells), its effect onradioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³ H] serotonin uptake by HEKcells expressing cDNA for the human serotonin transporter (HEK-hSERTcells), and its effects on radioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³H] norepinephrine uptake by HEK cells expressing cDNA for the humannorepinephrine transporter (HEK-hNET cells).

In HEK-hDAT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site waslower than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,171was 1433 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 759 nM. In the uptake assays 31,171 was less potent atblocking the uptake of [³ H] dopamine, with an IC₅₀ value of )>10 μM, ascompared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =190 nM). A Hill coefficientother than one suggests complex interactions with binding or uptakesites.

In HEK-hSERT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding sitewas higher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for thesame site(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by31,171 was 114 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55 binding was 387 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,171 was less potentat blocking the uptake of [³ H] serotonin, with an IC₅₀ value of 3937nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =336 nM).

In HEK-hNET cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site waslower than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,171was 7045 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 1766 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,171 was less potent atblocking the uptake of [³ H] norepinephrine, with an IC₅₀ value of >10μM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =230 nM).

Effects of 31,171 on HEK-hDAT, HEK-hSERT and HEK-hNET cells

    ______________________________________                                                        31,171   Cocaine                                              ______________________________________                                        HEK-hDAT cells                                                                  [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 1433 ± 587  759 ± 93                                       Hill coefficient -0.53 ± 0.17   -0.91                                     ± 0.20                                          [.sup.3 H] Dopamine Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) >10 μM 190 ± 21                                           HEK-hSERT cells                                   [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 114 ± 49  387 ± 88                                         Hill coefficient -0.64 ± 0.06   -1.02                                     ± 0.10                                          [.sup.3 H] Serotonin Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 3937 ± 856  336 ± 78                                     HEK-hNET cells                                    [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 7045 ± 1623 1766 ± 369                                     Hill coefficient -1.39 ± 0.43   -0.76                                     ± 0.09                                          [.sup.3 H] NE Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) >10 μM 230 ± 41                   ______________________________________                                    

Numbers represent the means±SEM from at least three independentexperiments, each conducted with duplicate (for binding assays) ortriplicate (for uptake assays) determinations. When the K₁ or the IC₅₀for the test compound is greater than 10 μM, only two experiments areconducted and no standard error is reported.

Compound #31,172 was tested for its effects on radioligand I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55) binding to and [³ H] dopamine uptake by HEK cells expressingcDNA for the human dopamine transporter (HEK-hDAT cells), its effect onradioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³ H] serotonin uptake by HEKcells expressing cDNA for the human serotonin transporter (HEK-hSERTcells), and its effects on radioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³H] norepinephrine uptake by HEK cells expressing cDNA for the humannorepinephrine transporter (HEK-hNET cells).

In HEK-hDAT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,172was 61 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 759 nM. In the uptake assays 31,172 had about the samepotency at blocking the uptake of [³ H] dopamine, with an IC₅₀ value of73 nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =190 nM). A Hillcoefficient other than one suggests complex interactions with binding oruptake sites.

In HEK-hSERT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding sitewas lower than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for thesame site(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by31,172 was 1147 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55 binding was 387 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,172 was less potentat blocking the uptake of [³ H] serotonin, with an IC₅₀ value of 1226nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =336 nM).

In HEK-hNET cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,172was 477 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 1766 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,172 had about the samepotency at blocking the uptake of [³ H] norepinephrine, with an IC₅₀value of 192 nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =230 nM).

Effects of 31,172 on HEK-hDAT, HEK-hSERT and HEK-hNET cells

    ______________________________________                                                        31,172   Cocaine                                              ______________________________________                                        HEK-hDAT cells                                                                  [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 61 ± 11 759 ± 93                                           Hill coefficient -0.89 ± 0.12   -0.91                                     ± 0.20                                          [.sup.3 H] Dopamine Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 73 ± 17 190 ± 21                                          HEK-hSERT cells                                   [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 1142 ± 212  387 ± 88                                       Hill coefficient -0.98 ± 0.09   -1.02                                     ± 0.10                                          [.sup.3 H] Serotonin Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 1226 ± 135  336 ± 78                                     HEK-hNET cells                                    [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 477 ± 80  1766 ± 369                                       Hill coefficient -0.97 ± 0.10   -0.76                                     ± 0.09                                          [.sup.3 H] NE Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 192 ± 52  230 ± 41                ______________________________________                                    

Numbers represent the means±SEM from at least three independentexperiments, each conducted with duplicate (for binding assays) ortriplicate (for uptake assays) determinations. When the K₁ or the IC₅₀for the test compound is greater than 10 μM, only two experiments areconducted and no standard error is reported.

Compound #31,173 was tested for its effects on radioligand I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55) binding to and [³ H] dopamine uptake by HEK cells expressingcDNA for the human dopamine transporter (HEK-hDAT cells), its effect onradioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³ H] serotonin uptake by HEKcells expressing cDNA for the human serotonin transporter (HEK-hSERTcells), and its effects on radioligand ([ISuprscpt 125] RTI-55) bindingand [³ H] norepinephrine uptake by HEK cells expressing cDNA for thehuman norepinephrine transporter (HEK-hNET cells).

In HEK-hDAT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,173was 142 nM and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 759 nM. In the uptake assays 31,173 was less potent atblocking the uptake of [³ H] dopamine, with an IC₅₀ value of 404 nM, ascompared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =190 nM). A Hill coefficientother than one suggests complex interactions with binding or uptakesites.

In HEK-hSERT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding sitewas lower than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for thesame site(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by31,173 was 2601 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55 binding was 387 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,173 was less potentat blocking the uptake of [³ H] serotonin, with an IC₅₀ value of 6879nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =336 nM).

In HEK-hNET cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,173was 744 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 1766 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,173 was less potent atblocking the uptake of [³ H] norepinephrine, with an IC₅₀ value of 620nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =230 nM).

Effects of 31,173 on HEK-hDAT, HEK-hSERT and HEK-hNET cells

    ______________________________________                                                        31,173   Cocaine                                              ______________________________________                                        HEK-hDAT cells                                                                  [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 142 ± 36  759 ± 93                                         Hill coefficient -0.79 ± 0.07   -0.91                                     ± 0.20                                          [.sup.3 H] Dopamine Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 404 ± 95  190 ± 21                                        HEK-hSERT cells                                   [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 2601 ± 97  387 ± 88                                        Hill coefficient -0.83 ± 0.12   -1.02                                     ± 0.10                                          [.sup.3 H] Serotonin Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 6879 ± 1100 336 ± 78                                     HEK-hNET cells                                    [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 744 ± 213 1766 ± 369                                       Hill coefficient -0.77 ± 0.10   -0.76                                     ± 0.09                                          [.sup.3 H] NE Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 620 ± 162 230 ± 41                ______________________________________                                    

Numbers represent the means±SEM from at least three independentexperiments, each conducted with duplicate (for binding assays) ortriplicate (for uptake assays) determinations. When the K₁ or the IC₅₀for the test compound is greater than 10 μM, only two experiments areconducted and no standard error is reported.

Compound #31,174 was tested for its effects on radioligand I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55) binding to and [³ H] dopamine uptake by HEK cells expressingcDNA for the human dopamine transporter (HEK-hDAT cells), its effect onradioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³ H] serotonin uptake by HEKcells expressing cDNA for the human serotonin transporter (HEK-hSERTcells), and its effects on radioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³H] norepinephrine uptake by HEK cells expressing cDNA for the humannorepinephrine transporter (HEK-hNET cells).

In HEK-hDAT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,174was 28 nM and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 759 nM. In the uptake assays 31,174 was more potent atblocking the uptake of [³ V] dopamine, with an IC₅₀ value of 68 nM, ascompared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =190 nM). A Hill coefficientother than one suggests complex interactions with binding or uptakesites.

In HEK-hSERT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding sitewas higher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for thesame site(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by31,174 was 125 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55 binding was 387 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,174 had about thesame potency at blocking the uptake of [³ H] serotonin, with an IC₅₀value of 2429 nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =336 nM).

In HEK-hNET cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,174was 82 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 1766 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,174 was less potent atblocking the uptake of [³ H] norepinephrine, with an IC₅₀ value of 116nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =230 nM).

Effects of 31,174 on HEK-hDAT, HEK-hSERT and HEK-hNET cells

    ______________________________________                                                        31,174   Cocaine                                              ______________________________________                                        HEK-hDAT cells                                                                  [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 28 ± 7  759 ± 93                                           Hill coefficient -0.92 ± 0.10   -0.91                                     ± 0.20                                          [.sup.3 H] Dopamine Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 68 ± 8  190 ± 21                                          HEK-hSERT cells                                   [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 125 ± 12  387 ± 81                                         Hill coefficient -1.01 ± 0.14   -1.02                                     ± 0.10                                          [.sup.3 H] Serotonin Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 249 ± 31  336 ± 78                                       HEK-hNET cells                                    [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 82 ± 12 1766 ± 369                                         Hill coefficient -1.24 ± 0.09   -0.76                                     ± 0.99                                          [.sup.3 H] NE Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 116 ± 52  230 ± 41                ______________________________________                                    

Numbers represent the means±SEM from at least three independentexperiments, each conducted with duplicate (for binding assays) ortriplicate (for uptake assays) determinations. When the K₁ or the IC₅₀for the test compound is greater than 10 μM, only two experiments areconducted and no standard error is reported.

Compound #31,175 was tested for its effects on radioligand I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55) binding to and [³ H dopamine uptake by HEK cells expressing cDNAfor the human dopamine transporter (HEK-hDAT cells), its effect onradioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³ H] serotonin uptake by HEKcells expressing cDNA for the human serotonin transporter (HEK-hSERTcells), and its effects on radioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³H] norepinephrine uptake by HEK cells expressing cDNA for the humannorepinephrine transporter (HEK-hNET cells).

In HEK-hDAT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,175was 30 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 759 nM. In the uptake assays 31,175 had about the samepotency at blocking the uptake of [³ H] dopamine, with an IC₅₀ value of119 nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =190 nM). A Hillcoefficient other than one suggests complex interactions with binding oruptake sites.

In HEK-hSERT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding sitewas lower than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for thesame site(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by31,175 was 550 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55 binding was 387 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,175 was less potentat blocking the uptake of [³ H] serotonin, with an IC₅₀ value of 1054nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =336 nM).

In HEK-hNET cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,175was 370 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 1766 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,175 had about the samepotency at blocking the uptake of [³ H] norepinephrine, with an IC₅₀value of 279 nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =230 nM).

Effects of 31,175 on HEK-hDAT, HEK-hSERT and HEK-hNET cells

    ______________________________________                                                        31,175   Cocaine                                              ______________________________________                                        HEK-hDAT cells                                                                  [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 30 ± 10 759 ± 93                                           Hill coefficient -0.85 ± 0.07   -0.91                                     ± 0.20                                          [.sup.3 H] Dopamine Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 119 ± 11  190 ± 21                                        HEK-hSERT cells                                   [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 550 ± 70  387 ± 88                                         Hill coefficient -0.81 ± 0.09   -1.02                                     ± 0.10                                          [.sup.3 H] Serotonin Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 1054 ± 130  336 ± 78                                     HEK-hNET cells                                    [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 370 ± 126 1766 ± 369                                       Hill coefficient -1.05 ± 0.07   -0.76                                     ± 0.09                                          [.sup.3 H] NE Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 279 ± 67  230 ± 41                ______________________________________                                    

Numbers represent the means±SEM from at least three independentexperiments, each conducted with duplicate (for binding assays) ortriplicate (for uptake assays) determinations. When the K₁ or the IC₅₀for the test compound is greater than 10 μM, only two experiments areconducted and no standard error is reported.

Compound #31,176 was tested for its effects on radioligand I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55) binding to and [³ H] dopamine uptake by HEK cells expressingcDNA for the human dopamine transporter (HEK-hDAT cells), its effect onradioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³ H] serotonin uptake by HEKcells expressing cDNA for the human serotonin transporter (HEK-hSERTcells), and its effects on radioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³H] norepinephrine uptake by HEK cells expressing cDNA for the humannorepinephrine transporter HK-HNET cells).

In HEK-hDAT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,176was 322 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 759 nM. In the uptake assays 31,176 was less potent atblocking the uptake of [³ H] dopamine, with an IC₅₀ value of 349 nM, ascompared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =190 nM). A Hill coefficientother than one suggests complex interactions with binding or uptakesites.

In HEK-hSERT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding sitewas lower than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for thesame site(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by31,176 was 1527 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55 binding was 387 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,176 was less potentat blocking the uptake of [³ H] serotonin, with an IC₅₀ value of 1695nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =336 nM).

In HEK-hNET cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,176was 194 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 1766 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,176 had about the samepotency at blocking the uptake of [³ H] norepinephrine, with an IC₅₀value of 210 nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =230 nM).

Effects of 31,176 on HEK-hDAT, HEK-hSERT and HEK-hNET Cells

    ______________________________________                                                        31,176   Cocaine                                              ______________________________________                                        HEK-hDAT cells                                                                  [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 322 ± 57  759 ± 93                                         Hill coefficient -1.19 ± 0.17   -0.91                                     ± 0.20                                          [.sup.3 H] Dopamine Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 349 ± 18  190 ± 21                                        HEK-hSERT cells                                   [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 1527 ± 421  387 ± 88                                       Hill coefficient -0.82 ± 0.09   -1.02                                     ± 0.10                                          [.sup.3 H] Serotonin Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 1695 ± 370  336 ± 78                                     HEK-hNET cells                                    [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 194 ± 79  1766 ± 369                                       Hill coefficient -1.14 ± 0.20   -0.76                                     ± 0.09                                          [.sup.3 H] NE Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 210 ± 33  230 ± 41                ______________________________________                                    

Numbers represent the means±SEM from at least three independentexperiments, each conducted with duplicate (for binding assays) ortriplicate (for uptake assays) determinations. When the K₁ or the IC₅₀for the test compound is greater than 10 μM, only two experiments areconducted and no standard error is reported.

Compound #31,177 was tested for its effects on radioligand I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55) binding to and [³ H] dopamine uptake by HEK cells expressingcDNA for the human dopamine transporter (HEK-hDAT cells), its effect onradioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³ H] serotonin uptake by HEKcells expressing cDNA for the human serotonin transporter (HEK-hSERTcells), and its effects on radioligand ([¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³ H]norepinephrine uptake by HEK cells expressing cDNA for the humannorepinephrine transporter (HEK-hNET cells).

In HHEK-hDAT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding sitewas higher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for thesame site(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by31,177 was 122 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55 binding was 759 nM. In the uptake assays 31,177 had about thesame potency at blocking the uptake of [³ H] dopamine, with an IC₅₀value of 237 nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =190 nM). AHill coefficient other than one suggests complex interactions withbinding or uptake sites.

In HEK-hSERT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding sitewas lower than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for thesame site(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by31,166 was 126 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55 binding was 387 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,166 was less potentat blocking the uptake of [³ H] serotonin, with an IC₅₀ value of 2429nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =336

In HEK-hNET cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,177was 30 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 1766 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,177 was more potent atblocking the uptake of [³ H] norepinephrine, with an IC₅₀ value of 143nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =230 nM).

Effects of 31,177 on HEK-hDAT, HEK-hSERT and HEK-hNET cells

    ______________________________________                                                        31,177   Cocaine                                              ______________________________________                                        HEK-hDAT cells                                                                  [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 122 ± 12  759 ± 93                                         Hill coefficient -1.05 ± 0.14   -0.91                                     ± 0.20                                          [.sup.3 H] Dopamine Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 237 ± 41  190 ± 21                                        HEK-hSERT cells                                   [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 438 ± 122 387 ± 88                                         Hill coefficient -0.77 ± 0.10   -1.02                                     ± 0.10                                          [.sup.3 H] Serotonin Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 1705 ± 560  336 ± 78                                     HEK-hNET cells                                    [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 30 ± 5  1766 ± 369                                         Hill coefficient -0.95 ± 0.06   -0.76                                     ± 0.09                                          [.sup.3 H] NE Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 143 ± 27  230 ± 41                ______________________________________                                    

Numbers represent the means±SEM from at least three independentexperiments, each conducted with duplicate (for binding assays) ortriplicate (for uptake assays) determinations. When the K₁ or the IC₅₀for the test compound is greater than 10 μM, only two experiments areconducted and no standard error is reported.

Compound #31,178 was tested for its effects on radioligand I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55) binding to and [³ H] dopamine uptake by HEK cells expressingcDNA for the human dopamine transporter (HEK-hDAT cells), its effect onradioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³ H] serotonin uptake by HEKcells expressing cDNA for the human serotonin transporter (HEK-hSERTcells), and its effects on radioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³H] norepinephrine uptake by HEK cells expressing cDNA for the humannorepinephrine transporter (HEK-hNET cells).

In HEK-hDAT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,178was 19 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 759 nM. In the uptake assays 31,178 was more potent atblocking the uptake of [³ H] dopamine, with an IC₅₀ value of 85 nM, ascompared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =190 nM). A Hill coefficientother than one suggests complex interactions with binding or uptakesites.

In HEK-hSERT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding sitewas lower than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for thesame site(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by31,178 was 368 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55 binding was 387 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,178 was less potentat blocking the uptake of [³ H] serotonin, with an IC₅₀ value of 1645nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =336 nM).

In HEK-hNET cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,178was 126 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 1766 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,178 had the same potencyat blocking the uptake of [³ H] norepinephrine, with an IC₅₀ value of329 nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =230 nM).

Effects of 31,178 on HEK-hDAT, HEK-hSERT and HEK-hNET cells

    ______________________________________                                                        31,178   Cocaine                                              ______________________________________                                        HEK-hDAT cells                                                                  [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 19 ± 5  759 ± 93                                           Hill coefficient -0.85 ± 0.10   -0.91                                     ± 0.20                                          [.sup.3 H] Dopamine Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 85 ± 24 190 ± 21                                          HEK-hSERT cells                                   [[I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 368 ± 105 387 ± 88                                        Hill coefficient -0.81 ± 0.14   -1.02                                     ± 0.10                                          [.sup.3 H] Serotonin Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 1645 ± 554  336 ± 78                                     HEK-hNET cells                                    [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 126 ± 26  1766 ± 369                                       Hill coefficient -1.06 ± 0.26   -0.76                                     ± 0.09                                          [.sup.3 H] NE Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 329 ± 62  230 ± 41                ______________________________________                                    

Numbers represent the means±SEM from at least three independentexperiments, each conducted with duplicate (for binding assays) ortriplicate (for uptake assays) determinations. When the K₁ or the IC₅₀for the test compound is greater than 10 μM, only two experiments areconducted and no standard error is reported.

Compound #31,179 was tested for its effects on radioligand I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55) binding to and [³ H] dopamine uptake by HEK cells expressingcDNA for the human dopamine transporter (HEK-hDAT cells), its effect onradioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³ H] serotonin uptake by HEKcells expressing cDNA for the human serotonin transporter (HEK-hSERTcells), and its effects on radioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³H] norepinephrine uptake by HEK cells expressing cDNA for the humannorepinephrine transporter (HEK-hNET cells).

In HEK-hDAT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,179was 87 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 759 nM. In the uptake assays 31,179 was less potent atblocking the uptake of [³ H] dopamine, with an IC₅₀ value of 364 nM, ascompared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =190 nM). A Hill coefficientother than one suggests complex interactions with binding or uptakesites.

In HEK-hSERT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding sitewas higher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for thesame site(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by31,179 was 888 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I125]RTI-55 binding was 387 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,179 was less potentat blocking the uptake of [³ H] serotonin, with an IC₅₀ value of 189 nM,as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =336 nM).

In HEK-hNET cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,180was 23 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 1766 nm. In the uptake assays, 31,180 was less potent atblocking the uptake of [³ H] norepinephrine, with an IC₅₀ value of 97nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =230 nM).

Effects of 31,180 on HEK-hDAT, HEK-hSERT and HEK-hNET cells

    ______________________________________                                                        31,179   Cocaine                                              ______________________________________                                        HEK-hDAT cells                                                                  [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 87 ± 9  759 ± 93                                           Hill coefficient -0.84 ± 0.02   -0.91                                     ± 0.20                                          [.sup.3 H] Dopamine Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 3634 ± 69  190 ± 21                                       HEK-hSERT cells                                   [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 888 ± 374 387 ± 88                                         Hill coefficient -0.92 ± 0.05   -1.02                                     ± 0.10                                          [.sup.3 H] Serotonin Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 1832 ± 580  336 ± 78                                     HEK-hNET cells                                    [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 187 ± 98  1766 ± 369                                       Hill coefficient -1.26 ± 0.20   -0.76                                     ± 0.09                                          [.sup.3 H] NE Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 189 ± 3  230 ± 41                 ______________________________________                                    

Numbers represent the means±SEM from at least three independentexperiments, each conducted with duplicate (for binding assays) ortriplicate (for uptake assays) determinations. When the K₁ or the IC₅₀for the test compound is greater than 10 μM, only two experiments areconducted and no standard error is reported.

Compound #31,180 was tested for its effects on radioligand I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55) binding to and [³ H] dopamine uptake by HEK cells expressingcDNA for the human dopamine transporter (HEK-hDAT cells), its effect onradioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³ H] serotonin uptake by HEKcells expressing cDNA for the human serotonin transporter (HEK-hSERTcells), and its effects on radioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³H] norepinephrine uptake by HEK cells expressing cDNA for the humannorepinephrine transporter (HEK-hNET cells).

In HEK-hDAT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,180was 18 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 759 nM. In the uptake assays 31,180 had about the samepotency at blocking the uptake of [³ H] dopamine, with an IC₅₀ value of145 nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =190 niM). A Hillcoefficient other than one suggests complex interactions with binding oruptake sites.

In HEK-hSERT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding sitewas higher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for thesame site(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by31,180 was 214 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55 binding was 387 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,180 was less potentat blocking the uptake of [³ H] serotonin, with an IC₅₀ value of 818 nMas compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =336 nM).

In HEK-hNET cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,180was 23 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 1766 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,180 was less potent atblocking the uptake of [³ H] norepinephrine, with an IC₅₀ value of 97nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =230 nM).

    ______________________________________                                                        31,180   Cocaine                                              ______________________________________                                        HEK-hDAT cells                                                                  [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 18 ± 2  759 ± 93                                           Hill coefficient -0.81 ± 0.09   -0.91                                     ± 0.20                                          [.sup.3 H] Dopamine Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 145 ± 29  190 ± 21                                        HEK-hSERT cells                                   [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 214 ± 55  387 ± 88                                         Hill coefficient -1.08 ± 0.14   -1.02                                     ± 0.10                                          [.sup.3 H] Serotonin Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 818 ± 160 336 ± 78                                       HEK-hNET cells                                    [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 23 ± 3  1766 ± 369                                         Hill coefficient -1.39 ± 0.45   -0.76                                     ± 0.09                                          [.sup.3 H] NE Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 97 ± 30 230 ± 41                  ______________________________________                                    

Numbers represent the means±SEM from at least three independentexperiments, each conducted with duplicate (for binding assays) ortriplicate (for uptake assays) determinations. When the K₁ or the IC₅₀for the test compound is greater than 10 μM, only two experiments areconducted and no standard error is reported.

Compound #31,181 was tested for its effects on radioligand I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55) binding to and [³ H] dopamine uptake by HEK cells expressingcDNA for the human dopamine transporter (HEK-hDAT cells), its effect onradioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³ H] serotonin uptake by HEKcells expressing cDNA for the human serotonin transporter (HEK-hSERTcells), and its effects on radioligand ([ISuprscpt 125] RTI-55) bindingand [³ M] norepinephrine uptake by HEK cells expressing cDNA for thehuman norepinephrine transporter (HEK-hNET cells).

In HEK-hDAN cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,181was 90 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 759 nM. In the uptake assays 31,18 was less potent atblocking the uptake of [³ H] dopamine, with an IC₅₀ value of 1259 nMK ascompared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =190 nM). A Hill coefficientother than one suggests complex interactions with binding or uptakesites.

In HEK-hSERT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding sitewas higher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for thesame site(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by31,181 was 533 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55 binding was 387 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,181 was less potentat blocking the uptake of [³ H] serotonin, with an IC₅₀ value of 2127nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =336 nM).

In HEK-hNET cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,181was 113 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 1766 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,181 was less potent atblocking the uptake of [³ H] norepinephrine, with an IC₅₀ value of 352nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =230 nM).

Effects of 31,181 on HEK-hDAT, HEK-hSERT and HEK-hNET cells

    ______________________________________                                                        31,180   Cocaine                                              ______________________________________                                        HEK-hDAT cells                                                                  [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 90 ± 13 759 ± 93                                           Hill coefficient -0.83 ± 0.03   -0.91                                     ± 0.20                                          [.sup.3 H] Dopamine Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 1259 ± 344  190 ± 21                                      HEK-hSERT cells                                   [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 533 ± 223 387 ± 88                                         Hill coefficient -0.80 ± 0.05   -1.02                                     ± 0.10                                          [.sup.3 H] Serotonin Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 2127 ± 467  336 ± 78                                     HEK-hNET cells                                    [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 113 ± 29  1766 ± 369                                       Hill coefficient -1.20 ± 0.23   -0.76                                     ± 0.09                                          [.sup.3 H] NE Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 352 ± 79  230 ± 41                ______________________________________                                    

Numbers represent the means±SEM from at least three independentexperiments, each conducted with duplicate (for binding assays) ortriplicate (for uptake assays) determinations. When the K₁ or the IC₅₀for the test compound is greater than 10 μM, only two experiments areconducted and no standard error is reported.

Compound #31,182 was tested for its effects on radioligand I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55) binding to and [³ H] dopamine uptake by HEK cells expressingcDNA for the human dopamine transporter (HEK-hDAT cells), its effect onradioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³ H] serotonin uptake by HEKcells expressing cDNA for the human serotonin transporter (HEK-hSERTcells), and its effects on radioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³H] norepinephrine uptake by HEK cells expressing cDNA for the humannorepinephrine transporter (HEK-hNET cells).

In HEK-hDAT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,182was 70 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 759 nM. In the uptake assays 31,182 was more potent atblocking the uptake of [³ H] dopamine, with an IC₅₀ value of 105 nM, ascompared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =190 nM). A Hill coefficientother than one suggests complex interactions with binding or uptakesites.

In HEK-hSERT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding sitewas higher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for thesame site(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by31,182 was 316 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55 binding was 387 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,182 was less potentat blocking the uptake of [³ H] serotonin, with an IC₅₀ value of 774 nM,as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =336 nM).

In HEK-hNET cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,182was 41 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 1766 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,182 was more potent atblocking the uptake of [³ H] norepinephrine, with an IC₅₀ value of 48nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =230 nM).

Effects of 31,182 on HEK-hDAT, HEK-hSERT and HEK-hNET cells

    ______________________________________                                                        31,182   Cocaine                                              ______________________________________                                        HEK-hDAT cells                                                                  [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 70 ± 27 759 ± 93                                           Hill coefficient -2.01 ± 0.78   -0.91                                     ± 0.20                                          [.sup.3 H] Dopamine Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 105 ± 18  190 ± 21                                        HEK-hSERT cells                                   [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 316 ± 103 387 ± 88                                         Hill coefficient -0.89 ± 0.21   -1.02                                     ± 0.10                                          [.sup.3 H] Serotonin Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 774 ± 194 336 ± 78                                       HEK-hNET cells                                    [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 41 ± 15 1766 ± 369                                         Hill coefficient -1.11 ± 0.15   -0.76                                     ± 0.09                                          [.sup.3 H] NE Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 48 ± 12 230 ± 41                  ______________________________________                                    

Numbers represent the means±SEM from at least three independentexperiments, each conducted with duplicate (for binding assays) ortriplicate (for uptake assays) determinations. When the K₁ or the IC₅₀for the test compound is greater than 10 μM, only two experiments areconducted and no standard error is reported.

Compound #31,183 was tested for its effects on radioligand I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55) binding to and [³ H] dopamine uptake by HEK cells expressingcDNA for the human dopamine transporter (HEK-hDAT cells), its effect onradioligand ([I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³ H] serotonin uptake by HEKcells expressing cDNA for the human serotonin transporter (HEK-hSERTcells), and its effects on radioligand ([¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³ H]norepinephrine uptake by HEK cells expressing cDNA for the humannorepinephrine transporter (HEK-hNET cells).

In HEK-hDAT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,183was 1048 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 759 nM. In the uptake assays 31,183 was less potent atblocking the uptake of [³ H] dopamine, with an IC₅₀ value of 202 nM, ascompared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =190 nM). A Hill coefficientother than one suggests complex interactions with binding or uptakesites.

In HEK-hSERT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding sitewas higher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for thesame site(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by31,183 was 347 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55 binding was 387 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,183 was less potentat blocking the uptake of [³ H] serotonin, with an IC₅₀ value of 1132nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =336 nM).

In HEK-hNET cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,183was 151 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 1766 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,183 had the same potencyat blocking the uptake of [³ H] norepinephrine, with an IC₅₀ value of202 nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =230 nM).

Effects of 31,183 on HEK-hDAT, HEK-hSERT and HEK-hNET cells

    ______________________________________                                                        31,183   Cocaine                                              ______________________________________                                        HEK-hDAT cells                                                                  [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 104 ± 30  759 ± 93                                         Hill coefficient -0.86 ± 0.09   -0.91                                     ± 0.20                                          [.sup.3 H] Dopamine Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 498 ± 59  190 ± 21                                        HEK-hSERT cells                                   [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 347 ± 159 387 ± 88                                         Hill coefficient -0.81 ± 0.03   -1.02                                     ± 0.10                                          [.sup.3 H] Serotonin Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 1132 ± 202  336 ± 78                                     HEK-hNET cells                                    [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 151 ± 43  1766 ± 369                                       Hill coefficient -0.95 ± 0.09   -0.76                                     ± 0.09                                          [.sup.3 H] NE Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 202 ± 60  230 ± 41                ______________________________________                                    

Numbers represent the means±SEM from at least three independentexperiments, each conducted with duplicate (for binding assays) ortriplicate (for uptake assays) determinations. When the K₁ or the IC₅₀for the test compound is greater than 10 μM only two experiments areconducted and no standard error is reported.

Compound #31,184 was tested for its effects on radioligand [I¹²⁵ ]RTI-55) binding to and [³ H] dopamine uptake by HEK cells expressingcDNA for the human dopamine transporter (HEK-hDAT cells), its effect onradioligand [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³ H] serotonin uptake by HEKcells expressing cDNA for the human serotonin transporter (HEK-hSERTcells), and its effects on radioligand ([¹²⁵ ] RTI-55) binding and [³ H]norepinephrine uptake by HEK cells expressing cDNA for the humannorepinephrine transporter (HEK-hNET cells).

In HEK-hDAT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,184was 156 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 759 nM. In the uptake assays 31,184 was less potent atblocking the uptake of [³ H] dopamine, with an IC₅₀ value of 392 nM, ascompared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =190 nM). A hill coefficientother than one suggests complex interactions with binding or uptakesites.

In HEK-hSERT cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding sitewas lower than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for thesame site(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by31,184 was 55 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [¹²⁵ ]RTI-55 binding was 387 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,184 had about thesame potency at blocking the uptake of [³ H] serotonin, with an IC₅₀value of 392 nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =336 nM).

In HEK-hNET cells, the affinity of the compound for the binding site washigher than the affinity of cocaine, the standard compound, for the samesite(s). The K₁ value for the displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55 by 31,184was 119 nM, and the K₁ value for cocaine displacement of [I¹²⁵ ] RTI-55binding was 1766 nM. In the uptake assays, 31,184 had about the samepotency at blocking the uptake of [³ H] norepinephrine, with an IC₅₀value of 229 nM, as compared to the potency of cocaine (IC₅₀ =230 nM).

Effects of 31184 on HEK-hDAT, HEK-hSERT and HEK-hNET cells

    ______________________________________                                                        31,184   Cocaine                                              ______________________________________                                        HEK-hDAT cells                                                                  [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 156 ± 44  759 ± 93                                         Hill coefficient -0.89 ± 0.10   -0.91                                     ± 0.20                                          [.sup.3 H] Dopamine Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 392 ± 9  190 ± 21                                         HEK-hSERT cells                                   [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 55 ± 11 387 ± 88                                           Hill coefficient -1.27 ± 0.18   -1.02                                     ± 0.10                                          [.sup.3 H] Serotonin Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 392 ± 12  336 ±78                                        HEK-hNET cells                                    [I.sup.125 ] RTI-55 binding K.sub.1 (nM) 119 ± 17  1766 ± 369                                       Hill coefficient -1.10 ± 0.05   -0.76                                     ± 0.09                                          [.sup.3 H] NE Uptake IC.sub.50 (nM) 229 ± 72  230 ± 41                ______________________________________                                    

Numbers represent the means±SEM from at least three independentexperiments, each conducted with duplicate (for binding assays) ortriplicate (for uptake assays) determinations. When the K₁ or the IC₅₀for the test compound is greater than 10 μM, only two experiments areconducted and no standard error is reported.

We claim:
 1. A diamine dopamine or serotonin ligand having the formula:##STR36## l, m and n is the same or different and are an integer of 1 to6; X, Y and Z is the same or different and are hydrogen, halo,haloalkyl, (C₁ -C₆) alkyl, aryl, (C₁ -C₆) alkoxy, N-alkyl, (C₁ -C₆)acyloxy, N-alkylene, --SH, or --SR,R is selected from the groupconsisting of R₁, amino, nitro, cyano, hydroxy, --C(C═O) OR₆, --C(C═O)NR₅ R₄, NR₃ R₂ or S(═O)_(k) R₁ wherein _(k) is 1 or 2, and R₄ to R₆ areindependently hydrogen or (C₁ -C₆) alkyl; R₁, and R₂ are selected fromthe group consisting of hydrogen, (C₁ -C₆) alkyl, hydroxyalkyl ormercaptoalkyl, --C(═O) OR₁, cyano, (C₁ -C₆) alkenyl, (C₂ -C₆) alkenyl,or 1, 2, 4-oxadiazol-5-yl optionally substituted at the 3-position by Wwherein any (C₁ -C₆) alkyl, (C₁ -C₆) alkanoly, (C₂ -C₆) alkenyl or (C₂-C₆) alkenyl (C₁ -C₆) alkyl, hydroxy (C₁ -C₆) alkyl or mercapto (C₁ -C₆)alkyl optionally can be substituted by 1, 2 or 3 Z; W is selected fromthe group consisting of (C₁ -C₆) alkyl, phenyl, (C₁ -C₆) alkylsubstituted by 1, 2 or 3 Z and phenyl substituted with 1, 2 or 3 Z and φis selected from the group consisting of phenyl, napthyl, thienyl orpyridinyl.
 2. The compound of claim 1 wherein:X and Y are hydrogen, l, mand n are 2, R₁ and R₂ are selected from the group consisting of CH₃, C₂H₅ and hydrogen and φ is C₆ H₄ -.
 3. The compound of any one of claims 1or 2 which is labeled with a radionuclide.
 4. The compound of claim 3wherein said radionuclide is ^(99m) Tc.
 5. The compound of claim 3wherein said radionuclide is an iodine isotope.
 6. The method forimaging dopamine neurons in a mammal which comprises:administering tothe mammal an imaging dose of the compound of claim 1 labeled with aradionuclide and detecting binding of the compound in the mammal.
 7. Themethod for imaging dopamine neurons in a mammal whichcomprises:administering to the mammal an imaging dose of the compound ofclaim 2 labeled with a radionuclide and detecting binding of thecompound in the mammal.
 8. The method of treating an mammal afflictedwith cocaine abuse which comprises:administering to the mammal aneffective amount of a compound of claim
 1. 9. The method of treating ananimal afflicted with cocaine abuse which comprises:administering to themammal an effective amount of a compound of claim
 2. 10. The method oftreating an mammal afflicted with a neurodegenerated diseasecharacterized by a degeneration of dopamine neurons whichcomprises:administering to the mammal an effective amount of thecompound of claim
 1. 11. The method of treating an mammal afflicted witha neurodegenerated disease characterized by a degeneration of seratoninneurons which comprises:administering to the mammal an effective amountof the compound of claim
 1. 12. The method of treating a mammalafflicted with a neurodegenerated disease characterized by adegeneration of dopamine neurons which comprises:administering to themammal an effective amount of the compound of claim
 2. 13. The method oftreating a mammal afflicted with a neurodegenerated diseasecharacterized by a degeneration of seratonin neurons whichcomprises:administering to the mammal an effective amount of thecompound of claim 2.